Yoder v. Maddox

139 So. 791, 104 Fla. 354
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 791 (Yoder v. Maddox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yoder v. Maddox, 139 So. 791, 104 Fla. 354 (Fla. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Ellis are of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be reversed and the cause remanded while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the said decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members *355 in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether .the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton vs. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ehlis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 So. 791, 104 Fla. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yoder-v-maddox-fla-1932.