Yocum v. Reading City

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Yocum v. Reading City

84 A. 510, 235 Pa. 552, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 586

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 18, 1912

DocketAppeal, No. 153

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 84 A. 510 (Yocum v. Reading City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yocum v. Reading City, 84 A. 510, 235 Pa. 552, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 586 (Pa. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The negligence of the city in not maintaining its streets in a safe condition, if not conceded was not disputed and the' only question at the trial was whether the plaintiff made out a case clear of contributory negligence. On this subject nothing can be added to what is said by Judge Endlich in discharging the rules for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The negligence of the city in not maintaining its streets in a safe condition, if not conceded was not disputed and the' only question at the trial was whether the plaintiff made out a case clear of contributory negligence. On this subject nothing can be added to what is said by Judge Endlich in discharging the rules for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A. 510, 235 Pa. 552, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yocum-v-reading-city-pa-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack