Yocum v. Reading City
84 A. 510, 235 Pa. 552, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 586
Opinion
The negligence of the city in not maintaining its streets in a safe condition, if not conceded was not disputed and the' only question at the trial was whether the plaintiff made out a case clear of contributory negligence. On this subject nothing can be added to what is said by Judge Endlich in discharging the rules for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yocum v. Reading City, 84 A. 510, 235 Pa. 552, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 586 (Pa. 1912).
84 A. 510 (Yocum v. Reading City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rodgers v. Yellow Cab Co.
147 A.2d 611 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Downey v. Union Paving Co.
184 F.2d 481 (Third Circuit, 1949)
Boliver v. Philadelphia
9 A.2d 193 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Kuntz v. Waldameer Co.
68 Pa. Super. 73 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Miller v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
58 Pa. Super. 558 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)