Yocum v. Gordon A. Davis, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yocum v. Gordon A. Davis, Inc.

10 A.D.2d 597, 195 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 597 (Yocum v. Gordon A. Davis, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yocum v. Gordon A. Davis, Inc., 10 A.D.2d 597, 195 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified so as to require defendants to produce certified copies of New York State income tax returns of the corporate defendant relating to the calendar year 1954 or any part thereof, and so as to eliminate the requirement of the production of any other returns, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: There is no showing in the papers before us which justifies the production of the tax returns of the individual defendant or the production of the tax returns of the corporate defendant for any other than the year 1954. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Herkimer Special Term directing production of certain records of the Moose Head Hotel for discovery and inspection.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified so as to require defendants to produce certified copies of New York State income tax returns of the corporate defendant relating to the calendar year 1954 or any part thereof, and so as to eliminate the requirement of the production of any other returns, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: There is no showing in the papers before us which justifies the production of the tax returns of the individual defendant or the production of the tax returns of the corporate defendant for any other than the year 1954. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Herkimer Special Term directing production of certain records of the Moose Head Hotel for discovery and inspection.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 597, 195 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yocum-v-gordon-a-davis-inc-nyappdiv-1960.