Yocom v. Yocom

Missouri Court of Appeals

Yocom v. Yocom

521 S.W.3d 717, 2017 WL 2854189, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 673

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 2017·No. No. ED 104702·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Scot Yocom (“Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment modifying Husband’s maintenance obligation to Sherry Yocom (“Wife”). The modification judgment increased Husband’s maintenance obligation from $275 per month to $600 per month and ordered Husband to pay Wife’s attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Scot Yocom (“Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment modifying Husband’s maintenance obligation to Sherry Yocom (“Wife”). The modification judgment increased Husband’s maintenance obligation from $275 per month to $600 per month and ordered Husband to pay Wife’s attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Yocom v. Yocom, 521 S.W.3d 717, 2017 WL 2854189, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 673 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

521 S.W.3d 717 (Yocom v. Yocom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.