YOAST v. POTTSTOWN BOROUGH
This text of YOAST v. POTTSTOWN BOROUGH (YOAST v. POTTSTOWN BOROUGH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TERRENCE R. YOAST, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-720 : POTTSTOWN BOROUGH, et al., : Defendants. :
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of January 2020, upon consideration of the Motions to Dismiss of Anthony Hoch and PrimeCare Medical [Doc. No. 60], Justin O’Donoghue and Wisler Pearlstine [Doc. No. 61], Montgomery County, Kevin Steele, Timothy Stein, and Ryan VanDorick [Doc. No. 62], Edward and Jeanne Forbes [Doc. No. 63], Donald Cheetham and Legal Aid of Southeastern Pennsylvania [Doc. No. 65], and the Pottstown Defendants [Doc. No. 68], and the responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) Anthony Hoch and PrimeCare Medical’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is GRANTED as to the claims against PrimeCare Medical, which are DISMISSED without prejudice, and against Hoch in his official capacity, which are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Motion is DENIED as to the claim of deliberate indifference against Hoch in his individual capacity. 2) Montgomery County, Kevin Steele, Timothy Stein, and Ryan VanDorick’s Motion is GRANTED. The claims against Steele in both his individual and official capacities, and against Stein and VanDorick in their official capacities, are DISMISSED with prejudice. The claims as to Stein and VanDorick in their individual capacities, and as to Montgomery County, are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3) Justin O’Donoghue and Wisler Pearlstine’s Motion is GRANTED. The federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice and, because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, the state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to assertion in the appropriate state court.
4) Edward and Jeanne Forbes’s Motion is GRANTED and the claims against them, as well as against Adrian Smith, are DISMISSED without prejudice subject to assertion in the appropriate state court. 5) Donald Cheetham and Legal Aid of Southeastern Pennsylvania’s Motion is GRANTED. The federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice and, because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, the state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice subject to assertion in the appropriate state court. 6) The Pottstown Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. The federal claims that are barred by Heck1 are DISMISSED without prejudice to allow Yoast to refile his claims if he ever succeeds in overturning his convictions.2 The remaining federal claims against the
Pottstown Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, the state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice subject to assertion in the appropriate state court. 7) The federal claims against Aphrodite Hussain, Manjeet Singh, Catherine Hallinger, and Leon Smith are DISMISSED with prejudice. Because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, the state law claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice subject to assertion in the appropriate state court.
1 Counts XXIII-XXXVI, XXXVIII-LI, LVIII-LIX. 2 See Curry v. Yachera, 835 F.3d 373, 379 (3d Cir. 2016). 8) Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a Second Amended Complaint against VanDorick, Stein, Montgomery County, and PrimeCare, and only as to the denial of medical care claims, no later than February 7, 2020. Any amendment that brings claims other than those for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs will be stricken.
9) If Plaintiff does not file a Second Amended Complaint, Anthony Hoch shall answer the remaining claim, no later than February 28, 2020. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe ____________________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
YOAST v. POTTSTOWN BOROUGH, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yoast-v-pottstown-borough-paed-2020.