Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English

118 F.3d 667, 97 Daily Journal DAR 8491, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5243, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23726, 1997 WL 360928
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 1, 1997
DocketNos. 92-17087, 93-15061 and 93-15719
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 118 F.3d 667 (Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English, 118 F.3d 667, 97 Daily Journal DAR 8491, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5243, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23726, 1997 WL 360928 (9th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

The judgment of the en banc court, 69 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 1995), is vacated and the case is remanded to the original three-judge panel with instructions to remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1055, 137 L.Ed.2d 170 (1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coles v. Nyko Technologies, Inc.
247 F.R.D. 589 (C.D. California, 2007)
In Re Initiative Petition No. 366, State Question No. 689
2002 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2002)
Ruiz v. Hull
957 P.2d 984 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 F.3d 667, 97 Daily Journal DAR 8491, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5243, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23726, 1997 WL 360928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yniguez-v-arizonans-for-official-english-ca9-1997.