Yisrael v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Yisrael v. State

271 S.W.3d 647, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1742, 2008 WL 5396509

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 30, 2008·No. WD 68242, WD 68288·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ahijah Yisrael appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failing to assert a claim under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), in his direct appeal. The State of Missouri cross appeals the judgment of the motion court vacating Mr. Yisrael’s convictions and sentences based on a violation of Mr. Yisrael’s constitutional right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him under Crawford. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ahijah Yisrael appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failing to assert a claim under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), in his direct appeal. The State of Missouri cross appeals the judgment of the motion court vacating Mr. Yisrael’s convictions and sentences based on a violation of Mr. Yisrael’s constitutional right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him under Crawford. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Yisrael v. State, 271 S.W.3d 647, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1742, 2008 WL 5396509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

271 S.W.3d 647 (Yisrael v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related