Yih v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, LTD

S.D. New York

Yih v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, LTD

DecidedMay 19, 2022

Docket7:21-cv-08828

StatusUnknown

This text of Yih v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, LTD (Yih v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, LTD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yih v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, LTD, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 8828 (KMK) JUDGMENT TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD., Defendant. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated May 19, 2022, Plaintiff's Remand Motion is denied and Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted. Because there is no way for Plaintiff to plead around the fact that this Court’s lack of personal jurisdiction over Defendant has already been conclusively decided, and amendment would therefore be futile, the Court has dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. See Platform Real Estate v. U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, No. 19-CV-2575, 2020 WL 4482632, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2020) (“Where a plaintiffs claims are barred by collateral estoppel and further amendment would be futile, dismissal with prejudice is warranted." (citation omitted)); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York May 19, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerkof Court ys HK, MANGO DeputyClerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 8828 (KMK) JUDGMENT TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD., Defendant. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated May 19, 2022, Plaintiff's Remand Motion is denied and Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted. Because there is no way for Plaintiff to plead around the fact that this Court’s lack of personal jurisdiction over Defendant has already been conclusively decided, and amendment would therefore be futile, the Court has dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. See Platform Real Estate v. U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, No. 19-CV-2575, 2020 WL 4482632, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2020) (“Where a plaintiffs claims are barred by collateral estoppel and further amendment would be futile, dismissal with prejudice is warranted." (citation omitted)); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York May 19, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerkof Court ys HK, MANGO DeputyClerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Yih v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, LTD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yih-v-taiwan-semiconductor-manufacturing-company-ltd-nysd-2022.