Yigal v. City of Newport News

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 2002
Docket02-1576
StatusUnpublished

This text of Yigal v. City of Newport News (Yigal v. City of Newport News) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yigal v. City of Newport News, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1576

OMRI YIGAL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS; SUZIE ROBBINS; JENNIFER MITCHEL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-02-5-4)

Submitted: September 27, 2002 Decided: November 7, 2002

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Omri Yigal, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Omri Yigal appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to proceed in forma pauperis in his civil action. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Yigal v. City of Newport News, No. CA-02-5-4

(E.D. Va. May 15, 2002). We grant Yigal’s motion to proceed in

forma pauperis in this court. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yigal v. City of Newport News, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yigal-v-city-of-newport-news-ca4-2002.