Yi v. Moore

Fourth Circuit

Yi v. Moore

671 F. App'x 176

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2016·No. No. 16-1718·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district court’s dismissal to show that it is without [177]*177prejudice and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Moore, No. 8:16-cv-00789-TDG (D. Md. Apr. 21 & May 31, 2016); see also Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 262, 258 (4th Cir. 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district court’s dismissal to show that it is without [177]*177prejudice and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Moore, No. 8:16-cv-00789-TDG (D. Md. Apr. 21 & May 31, 2016); see also Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 262, 258 (4th Cir. 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Yi v. Moore, 671 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 176 (Yi v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related