Yi v. Golden Corral
This text of 671 F. App'x 177 (Yi v. Golden Corral) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no-reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district court's order to show that the dismissal is without prejudice and affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Golden Corral, No. 8:16-ev-01151-TDC (D. Md. May 31, 2016); see also Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 252, 258 (4th Cir. 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yi-v-golden-corral-ca4-2016.