Yfb v. Rdr

787 So. 2d 276, 2001 La. LEXIS 1117, 2001 WL 378355
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Yfb v. Rdr. Read the opinion of the Court — 787 So. 2d 276
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 12, 2001·No. 2001-CC-0345·Published

Opinion

787 So.2d 276 (2001)

Y.F.B.,
v.
R.D.R.

No. 2001-CC-0345.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 12, 2001.

PER CURIAM.

The application for reconsideration is denied. Relator's original writ application in this court was filed on February 6, 2001, sixty-two days after the court of appeal denied his writ application on December 6, 2000 and well outside of the thirty day period mandated by Supreme Court Rule X, § 5. Although relator's application in this court was filed within thirty days from the court of appeal's denial of rehearing, Supreme Court Rule X, § 5(a) extends the thirty day period for taking writs to this court only "in those instances where a rehearing is allowed" in the court of appeal. Uniform Court of Appeal Rules 4-9 and 2-18.7 do not provide for a rehearing from a denial of an application for supervisory writs.[1] Accordingly, the delay for taking writs to this court ran from the court of appeal's original writ denial, not its denial of rehearing.

NOTES

[1] We recognize the court of appeal's writ denial in this case was done with an opinion; however, the court's decree makes it clear that its ultimate holding was to deny the application for supervisory writs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yfb v. Rdr, 787 So. 2d 276, 2001 La. LEXIS 1117, 2001 WL 378355 (La. 2001).

787 So. 2d 276 (Yfb v. Rdr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.