Yeskel v. Murray Holding Co.
57 A.2d 390, 141 N.J. Eq. 366, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 639
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stein, and reported at 140 N. J. Eq. 195.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Preund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yeskel v. Murray Holding Co., 57 A.2d 390, 141 N.J. Eq. 366, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 639 (N.J. 1948).
57 A.2d 390 (Yeskel v. Murray Holding Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gabriel v. Auf Der Heide-Aragona, Inc.
82 A.2d 644 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)