Yeskel v. Murray Holding Co.

57 A.2d 390, 141 N.J. Eq. 366, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 639
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 A.2d 390 (Yeskel v. Murray Holding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yeskel v. Murray Holding Co., 57 A.2d 390, 141 N.J. Eq. 366, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 639 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stein, and reported at 140 N. J. Eq. 195.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Preund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gabriel v. Auf Der Heide-Aragona, Inc.
82 A.2d 644 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.2d 390, 141 N.J. Eq. 366, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeskel-v-murray-holding-co-nj-1948.