Yesilbogaz v. Reese, Reese

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Yesilbogaz v. Reese, Reese

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 27, 2026

Docket2D2025-2113

StatusPublished

This text of Yesilbogaz v. Reese, Reese (Yesilbogaz v. Reese, Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yesilbogaz v. Reese, Reese, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

AHMET CAN YESILBOGAZ and NAIDA ADIAN,

Appellants,

v.

SUMMER REESE, individually and as the personal representative of Ronald D. Reese; REESE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC; REESE’S TOY BARN AUTO DIVISION, LLC; BETTER WAY SOLUTIONS, INC.; NICHOLAS D. REESE, individually, and REESE PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC,

Appellees.

Nos. 2D2025-2113, 2D2025-2116 CONSOLIDATED

May 27, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Darren D. Farfante, Judge.

Ahmet Can Yesilbogaz and Naida Adian, pro se.

Matthew D. Morton of Morton Law Firm, LLC, Lithia, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, SLEET, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI