Yerger-Hagan v. Biddle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Yerger-Hagan v. Biddle

116 A. 927, 273 Pa. 61, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 516

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 6, 1922

DocketAppeal, No. 235

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A. 927 (Yerger-Hagan v. Biddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yerger-Hagan v. Biddle, 116 A. 927, 273 Pa. 61, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 516 (Pa. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff, a member of the Bar of Philadelphia, sued to recover for professional services claimed to have been rendered defendant. A rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense having been discharged by the court below, plaintiff appealed. An examination of both statement of claim and affidavit of defense shows that the latter denies the averments contained in the former in its material parts with such reasonable certainty as to take the case to the jury.

The court below was not in error in its conclusion and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff, a member of the Bar of Philadelphia, sued to recover for professional services claimed to have been rendered defendant. A rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense having been discharged by the court below, plaintiff appealed. An examination of both statement of claim and affidavit of defense shows that the latter denies the averments contained in the former in its material parts with such reasonable certainty as to take the case to the jury.

The court below was not in error in its conclusion and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A. 927, 273 Pa. 61, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yerger-hagan-v-biddle-pa-1922.