Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta

720 A.2d 514, 247 Conn. 905, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 377

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 15, 1998

DocketSC 15995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 720 A.2d 514 (Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta, 720 A.2d 514, 247 Conn. 905, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 377 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 203 (AC 16509), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court that it lacked jurisdiction to order rescission of the stipulated agreement between the parties?”

BERDON and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 203 (AC 16509), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court that it lacked jurisdiction to order rescission of the stipulated agreement between the parties?”

BERDON and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

720 A.2d 514, 247 Conn. 905, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeong-gil-kim-v-magnotta-conn-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack