Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta
720 A.2d 514, 247 Conn. 905, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 377
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 203 (AC 16509), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court that it lacked jurisdiction to order rescission of the stipulated agreement between the parties?”
BERDON and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta, 720 A.2d 514, 247 Conn. 905, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 377 (Colo. 1998).
720 A.2d 514 (Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kim v. Magnotta
733 A.2d 809 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)