Yeomans v. State of Texas

District Court, S.D. Texas·Decided September 30, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-00173·Unknown

Opinion

Southern District of Texas ENTERED September 30, □□□□ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JOSHUA RAY YEOMANS, § Plaintiff, V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00173 STATE OF TEXAS, ef al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 35). The M&R recommends that the Court grant the Motions to Dismiss filed by Judge Janna Whatley (Judge Whatley), (DE. 26), and District Clerk Heather Marks (Clerk Marks), (D.E. 28). (D.E. 35, p. 14). Plaintiff has not filed objections to this M&R. However, Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Sanctions, (D.E. 57), and a Motion for Contempt of Court, (D.E. 58), where Defendant says he did not receive a copy of the motions to dismiss. The Court does not consider these motions as objections to the M&R. The Court will instead address these filings in a separate order. When a party objects to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge, the district judge “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). As to any portion for which no objection is filed, a district court reviews for clearly erroneous factual findings and conclusions of law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the record, the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the M&R. (D.E. 35). 1/2

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the pending motions to dismiss. (D.E. 26; D.E. 28). Finally, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this Order, the most recent M&R, (D.E. 35), the motions to dismiss, (D.E. 26; D.E. 28), and a copy of the docket sheet to Plaintiff at his most up to date address. SO ORDERED. C lL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas September So3024

2/2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yeomans v. State of Texas, (S.D. Tex. 2024).

Yeomans v. State of Texas (Yeomans v. State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related