Yentis v. Mills

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Yentis v. Mills

140 A. 530, 291 Pa. 591, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 458

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 4, 1928

DocketAppeal, 105

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 A. 530 (Yentis v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yentis v. Mills, 140 A. 530, 291 Pa. 591, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 458 (Pa. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below refuged to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and this appeal followed. We have repeatedly said that the record must clearly show plain error of law before we will sustain such an appeal (Federal Sales Co. v. Farrell, 264 Pa. 149, 153; Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corporation, 291 Pa. 185), and this is not a case of that kind.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The court below refuged to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and this appeal followed. We have repeatedly said that the record must clearly show plain error of law before we will sustain such an appeal (Federal Sales Co. v. Farrell, 264 Pa. 149, 153; Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corporation, 291 Pa. 185), and this is not a case of that kind.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A. 530, 291 Pa. 591, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yentis-v-mills-pa-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack