Yentis v. Mills
140 A. 530, 291 Pa. 591, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 458
Opinion
The court below refuged to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and this appeal followed. We have repeatedly said that the record must clearly show plain error of law before we will sustain such an appeal (Federal Sales Co. v. Farrell, 264 Pa. 149, 153; Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corporation, 291 Pa. 185), and this is not a case of that kind.
The order of the court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yentis v. Mills, 140 A. 530, 291 Pa. 591, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 458 (Pa. 1928).
140 A. 530 (Yentis v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sipp v. Philadelphia Life Insurance
142 A. 221 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)