Yenovkian v. Apple Card/ Goldman Sachs Banks

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 7, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-00119·Unknown

Opinion

Sonia Yenovkian, 2:24-cv-00119-RFB-MDC Plaintiff(s),

vs. Order Apple Card/ Goldman Sachs Banks, Defendant(s). The Court received notice that mail was delivered as undeliverable to plaintiff. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff is reminded that pursuant to LR IA 3-1, she must immediately file written notification with the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney, or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff must notify the Court by May 22, 2024, of her current address. Failure to timely comply may result in recommendation that the action be dismissed. Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file a written notification with the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney, or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action. DATED this 7" day of May 2024. Ap - IT IS SO ORDERED. , 4 & TT . f\ fe Sei United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yenovkian v. Apple Card/ Goldman Sachs Banks, (D. Nev. 2024).

Yenovkian v. Apple Card/ Goldman Sachs Banks (Yenovkian v. Apple Card/ Goldman Sachs Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
United States v. Horacio Alvarado
951 F.2d 22 (Second Circuit, 1991)