Yendes v. Shaw

Ohio Court of Appeals

Yendes v. Shaw

78 N.E.2d 696, 81 Ohio App. 232, 50 Ohio Law. Abs. 31, 37 Ohio Op. 55, 1947 Ohio App. LEXIS 617

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 10, 1947

Docket1955

StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.E.2d 696 (Yendes v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yendes v. Shaw, 78 N.E.2d 696, 81 Ohio App. 232, 50 Ohio Law. Abs. 31, 37 Ohio Op. 55, 1947 Ohio App. LEXIS 617 (Ohio Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT

Submitted on motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not a final order.

The defendant-appellant filed three separate defenses and a cross petition. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the second and third defenses and the cross petition. The defendant-appellant not desiring to plead further, the second and third defenses and the cross petition were dismissed.

An order sustaining a demurrer without dismissing the action is not a final order, as the Court may grant leave to amend: National Guarantee & Finance Company v Russell; 25 Abs 483. However, an order sustaining a demurrer to the second and third defenses and cross petition, and dismissing said defenses and cross-petition, is a final order within the provisions of §12223-2 GC from which an appeal may be taken: Latham v Ransome Concrete Machinery Co., 13 Abs 63; More-head v Central Trust Co., 54 Oh Ap 9.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

By THE COURT

Submitted on motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not a final order.

The defendant-appellant filed three separate defenses and a cross petition. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the second and third defenses and the cross petition. The defendant-appellant not desiring to plead further, the second and third defenses and the cross petition were dismissed.

An order sustaining a demurrer without dismissing the action is not a final order, as the Court may grant leave to amend: National Guarantee & Finance Company v Russell; 25 Abs 483. However, an order sustaining a demurrer to the second and third defenses and cross petition, and dismissing said defenses and cross-petition, is a final order within the provisions of §12223-2 GC from which an appeal may be taken: Latham v Ransome Concrete Machinery Co., 13 Abs 63; More-head v Central Trust Co., 54 Oh Ap 9.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 N.E.2d 696, 81 Ohio App. 232, 50 Ohio Law. Abs. 31, 37 Ohio Op. 55, 1947 Ohio App. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yendes-v-shaw-ohioctapp-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack