Yenchi v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

134 A.3d 51

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Yenchi v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 635 Pa. 211 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 30, 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are as follows:

(1) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the- trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of Petitioners on the grounds that Respondents had not adduced sufficient evidence to establish a pri-ma facie case that a fiduciary relationship existed between the parties; and

(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the trial court with respect to Petitioners’ motions in limine and granting Respondents’ request for a new trial on their fraudulent misrepresentation and Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are as follows:

(1) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the- trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of Petitioners on the grounds that Respondents had not adduced sufficient evidence to establish a pri-ma facie case that a fiduciary relationship existed between the parties; and

(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the trial court with respect to Petitioners’ motions in limine and granting Respondents’ request for a new trial on their fraudulent misrepresentation and Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law claims.

Yenchi v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 134 A.3d 51 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

134 A.3d 51 (Yenchi v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.