Yenchi, E. v. Ameriprise Financial, Pets.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 30, 2016·No. 493 WAL 2015 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

EUGENE R. YENCHI AND RUTH I. : No. 493 WAL 2015 YENCHI, HUSBAND AND WIFE, :

:

Respondents : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court :

v. :

: :

AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC., : AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES, : INC., RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE : COMPANY AND BRYAN GREGORY : HOLLAND, :

:

Petitioners :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are as follows:

(1) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of Petitioners on the grounds that Respondents had not adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case that a fiduciary relationship existed between the parties; and

(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the trial court with respect to Petitioners’ motions in limine and granting Respondents’ request for a new trial on their fraudulent misrepresentation and Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yenchi, E. v. Ameriprise Financial, Pets., (Pa. 2016).

Yenchi, E. v. Ameriprise Financial, Pets. (Yenchi, E. v. Ameriprise Financial, Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.