YEN

11 I. & N. Dec. 694
CourtBoard of Immigration Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1966
Docket1609
StatusPublished

This text of 11 I. & N. Dec. 694 (YEN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Immigration Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
YEN, 11 I. & N. Dec. 694 (bia 1966).

Opinion

Interim Decision #1609

NIATama or YEN In Visa Petition Proceedings A-12572684 Deckled by District Director February . 02, 1086'

Since a geneticist is a member of the professions within the meaning of section 101(a) (32), immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by P.L. 89-230, a visa petition is approved to accord beneficiary, a qualified geneticist, pref- erence classification under section 203(a) (3) of the Act.

The beneficiary is a 28-year-old citizen of China who is presently in the United States. The petitioner seeks to classify the benefici- ary as a preference immigrant under section 203(a) (3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by the Act of Octo- ber 3, 1965 (Public Law 89-236). That section provides that pref- erence classification thereunder may be given "to qualified immi- grants who are members of the professions, or who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences or the arts will substantially bene- fit prospectively the national economy, cultural interests, or welfare of the United States." ' Section 101(a) (32) of the Act, as amended, provides that: "The term `profession' shall include but not be limited to arehitects engi- neers, lawyers, physicians, and teachers in elementary or secondary ' schools, colleges, academies, or seminaries." Section 204(a) of the Act, as amended, provides that ". . . any alien desiring to be classified as a preference immigrant under sec- tion 203(a) (3) (or any person on behalf of such an alien) . . . may file a petition with the Attbrney General for such classification." It should be noted that, while the beneficiary is presently employed by the petitioner, an employer-employee relationship is not required between the petitioner and the beneficiary. Under the provisions of section 204(a), supra, the beneficiary could have elected to file the visa petition in his own !behalf. Under the provisions of sections 204.1(c) and 204.2(f), Title 8, Code of Federal Regulations, there must be submitted with the 694 Interim Decision. #1609

petition Form ES-575A, Application for Alien Employment Certifi- cation, executed in accordance with the, instructions for-the comple- tion of that form and. accompanied. by evidence of the beneficiary's qualifications as specified in those instructions. The petitioner has complied with that -requirement. The Form ZS-57 i and accom- panying evidence, 'showing that -the beneficiary bad completed all the requirements for a doctor of philosophy degree. in biochemical genetics in November 1965 and will receive that degree from the University of North Carolina in dime 1966, and..that. he had been employed as a • geneticist by ;the petitioner since-December 1965, were forwarded by the office to the Bureau of Employment Security, Department of Labor. That Department has returned the evidence and the Form ES-575A endorsed to show that the certification re- quired by section 212(a) (14) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by Public Law 89-236, has been issued. The certification is to the effect that there is a shortage of persons in the United States available to perform the services for which the beneficiary is qualified,and that the beneficiary's employment in his vocation will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of persons similarly employed in this country. The beneficiary's vocation, that of a geneticist, is not specifically named. in. section 101(a) (32) of the Act as a professiOn. In de- termining 'whether that vocation may be considered as a profession, has been made to the Dictionary of Ocoupationcil Titles 1965, Volume I, Definition of Titles, Third Edition, published. by the United States Departinent of Labor. The vocation "geneticist" is defined therein at page 331 as follows: "Studies inheritance and variation of characteristics in all forms of life: Pirforms experi- ments to determine laws, mechanisms, and environmental factors in origin, transmission and development of inherited traits! Analyses determinants responsible for specific inherited traits, such as color differences, disease resistance, and size to improve strength, rate of. maturity, fertility, and other desirable traits. Devises methods for altering or producing new traits, making use. of chemicals, heat, light, and other means." Volume II of the above publication lists the vocation of "genetic- ist" as an occupation within the biological sciences engaged in scientific research and indicates, at page 466, that "A bachelor's degree with a major hi the specialty area is the minimum require- ment for entrance into the field, with graduate degrees needed for more responsible research work and teachi g. A master's degree usually qualifies an individual for a position in applied research and for a laboratory teaching position in a -college, university, or in-

695 Interim Decision #1609 dustrial research setting. A Ph. D. is generally required for a position in basic. research and more advanced entry positions." • The high degree of education required for entry into this scientific field, as comparable to the degree of education required for the specific, professions named in section 101(a) (32), supra. Accord- ingly,it is concluded that the applicant is a qualified member of the • professions. He is, and intends to continue, in the field of genetics: The certification of the Secretary of Labor required by section 212 (a) (14) of the Act, as amended, has been issued. . it is ordered that the petition be and is hereby approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 I. & N. Dec. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yen-bia-1966.