Yeminy v. Adelman Pipe & Steel Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Yeminy v. Adelman Pipe & Steel Co.

162 So. 2d 261, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2881

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 1, 1964

DocketNo. 33194

StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 2d 261 (Yeminy v. Adelman Pipe & Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yeminy v. Adelman Pipe & Steel Co., 162 So. 2d 261, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2881 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 19, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 19, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 So. 2d 261, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeminy-v-adelman-pipe-steel-co-fla-1964.