Yelmini v. Yelmini, No. Fa98-0418072 (Dec. 30, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Yelmini v. Yelmini, No. Fa98-0418072 (Dec. 30, 1999)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 16726

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedDecember 30, 1999

DocketNo. FA98-0418072

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 16726 (Yelmini v. Yelmini, No. Fa98-0418072 (Dec. 30, 1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yelmini v. Yelmini, No. Fa98-0418072 (Dec. 30, 1999), 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 16726 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The following motions were heard in conjunction with a trial for dissolution of marriage: Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt coded #120, Plaintiff's Motion for contempt coded #140, Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt coded #149 and Defendant's Motion for Contempt and for Attorney's Fees coded #147.

During the pendency of the dissolution proceedings numerous motions were filed by both parties. Every action, every slight and every disagreement became the subject of a motion. There was a high level of acrimony and hostility between the parties.

During the pendency of the dissolution proceedings numerous motions were filed by both parties.

The court considered the evidence, C.G.S. § 36b-62, C.G.S. § 46b-87 and finds the following: CT Page 16727

1. Neither party is in contempt of court.

2. No attorney's fees are awarded to either party.

Crawford, J.

CT Page 16716

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The following motions were heard in conjunction with a trial for dissolution of marriage: Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt coded #120, Plaintiff's Motion for contempt coded #140, Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt coded #149 and Defendant's Motion for Contempt and for Attorney's Fees coded #147.

During the pendency of the dissolution proceedings numerous motions were filed by both parties. Every action, every slight and every disagreement became the subject of a motion. There was a high level of acrimony and hostility between the parties.

During the pendency of the dissolution proceedings numerous motions were filed by both parties.

The court considered the evidence, C.G.S. § 36b-62, C.G.S. § 46b-87 and finds the following: CT Page 16727

1. Neither party is in contempt of court.

2. No attorney's fees are awarded to either party.

Crawford, J.

CT Page 16716

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 16726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yelmini-v-yelmini-no-fa98-0418072-dec-30-1999-connsuperct-1999.

Opinion

1. Neither party is in contempt of court.

2. No attorney's fees are awarded to either party.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack