Yelmini v. Yelmini, No. Fa98-0418072 (Dec. 30, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Yelmini v. Yelmini, No. Fa98-0418072 (Dec. 30, 1999)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 16726

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided December 30, 1999·No. No. FA98-0418072·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The following motions were heard in conjunction with a trial for dissolution of marriage: Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt coded #120, Plaintiff's Motion for contempt coded #140, Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt coded #149 and Defendant's Motion for Contempt and for Attorney's Fees coded #147.

During the pendency of the dissolution proceedings numerous motions were filed by both parties. Every action, every slight and every disagreement became the subject of a motion. There was a high level of acrimony and hostility between the parties.

During the pendency of the dissolution proceedings numerous motions were filed by both parties.

The court considered the evidence, C.G.S. § 36b-62, C.G.S. § 46b-87 and finds the following: CT Page 16727

1. Neither party is in contempt of court.

2. No attorney's fees are awarded to either party.

Crawford, J.

CT Page 16716

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The following motions were heard in conjunction with a trial for dissolution of marriage: Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt coded #120, Plaintiff's Motion for contempt coded #140, Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt coded #149 and Defendant's Motion for Contempt and for Attorney's Fees coded #147.

During the pendency of the dissolution proceedings numerous motions were filed by both parties. Every action, every slight and every disagreement became the subject of a motion. There was a high level of acrimony and hostility between the parties.

During the pendency of the dissolution proceedings numerous motions were filed by both parties.

The court considered the evidence, C.G.S. § 36b-62, C.G.S. § 46b-87 and finds the following: CT Page 16727

1. Neither party is in contempt of court.

2. No attorney's fees are awarded to either party.

Crawford, J.

CT Page 16716

Yelmini v. Yelmini, No. Fa98-0418072 (Dec. 30, 1999), 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 16726 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 16726 (Yelmini v. Yelmini, No. Fa98-0418072 (Dec. 30, 1999)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

1. Neither party is in contempt of court.

2. No attorney's fees are awarded to either party.

Related