Yellowcake, Inc. v. Hyphy Music, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 14, 2022·No. 1:20-cv-00988·Unknown

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 YELLOWCAKE, INC., a California corporation Case No. 1:20-cv-00988-AWI-BAM 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13

14 HYPHY MUSIC, INC.,

15 Defendant.

16 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. 17

18 I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 19 A. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 20 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 21 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation 22 may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the 23 Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 24 1 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 2 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from 3 public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that 4 are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The 5 parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section XIII(C), below, that this

6 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 7 under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed 8 and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the 9 Court to file material under seal. 10 II. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 11 A. This action is likely to involve commercial, financial, and/or proprietary 12 information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 13 any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 14 confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 15 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 16 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or

17 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of 18 third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or 19 which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or 20 federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to 21 expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes 22 over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the 23 parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted 24 reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct 1 of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends 2 of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is 3 the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential 4 for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief 5 that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is

6 good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 7 III. DEFINITIONS 8 A. Action: The above-captioned pending federal lawsuit. 9 B. Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 10 of information or items under this Order. 11 C. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of how 12 it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 13 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 14 the Good Cause Statement. 15 D. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as 16 their support staff).

17 E. Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information or 18 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 19 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 20 F. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of 21 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained 22 (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that 23 are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this 24 matter. 1 G. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 2 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to 3 serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 4 H. In-House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 5 In-House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other

6 outside counsel. 7 I. Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 8 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 9 J. Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party 10 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 11 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law 12 firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 13 K. Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 14 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and 15 their support staffs). 16 L. Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or

17 Discovery Material in this Action. 18 M. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support 19 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 20 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or 21 medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 22 N. Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 23 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 1 O. Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 2 from a Producing Party. 3 IV. SCOPE 4 A. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 5 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or

6 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 7 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 8 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 9 B. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of 10 the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 11 V. DURATION 12 A. Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality 13 obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating 14 Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final 15 disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 16 defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein

17 after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, 18 or reviews of this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or 19 applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 20 VI. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 21 A. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection 22 1. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for 23 protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation 24 to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The 1 Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of 2 material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that 3 qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or 4 communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 5 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

6 2. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yellowcake, Inc. v. Hyphy Music, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Yellowcake, Inc. v. Hyphy Music, Inc. (Yellowcake, Inc. v. Hyphy Music, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)