Yellow Pine Co. v. Gutwilig

20 Misc. 634, 46 N.Y.S. 251
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJune 15, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Misc. 634 (Yellow Pine Co. v. Gutwilig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yellow Pine Co. v. Gutwilig, 20 Misc. 634, 46 N.Y.S. 251 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Opinion

Van Wyck, Ch. J.

The plaintiff had not rested when its request to withdraw a juror and defendant’s motion to nonsuit plaintiff were made. It was not error to deny the nonsuit, nor to. permit plaintiff to withdraw a juror with leave to apply at Special Term for leave to amend the complaint. It was proper for the Special Term to permit an amendment of the complaint upon payment of $30, the trial fee, to defendant. The defendant’s motion, made at the opening of the trial, to dismiss the complaint, because it did not state a cause of action, was properly denied as the complaint did state facts sufficient to constitute a good cause of action. The orders are affirmed, with costs.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Orders affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wabash Railroad v. McCormick
55 N.E. 251 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Misc. 634, 46 N.Y.S. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yellow-pine-co-v-gutwilig-nynyccityct-1897.