Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Yellow Page Cons. v. Amigo of Conn., No. Cv-97-0567141-S (May 28, 1999)

Yellow Page Cons. v. Amigo of Conn., No. Cv-97-0567141-S (May 28, 1999)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5860
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedMay 28, 1999
DocketNo. CV-97-0567141-S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5860 (Yellow Page Cons. v. Amigo of Conn., No. Cv-97-0567141-S (May 28, 1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yellow Page Cons. v. Amigo of Conn., No. Cv-97-0567141-S (May 28, 1999), 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5860 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR ARTICULATION
In overruling the plaintiff's objection to defendant's Motion to Reopen Judgment, the court in effect intended to grant the defendant's Motion to Reopen which is dated February 19, 1998.

In granting the plaintiff's Motion for Articulation, the court finds that although default entered on February 7, 1997, the defendant, by virtue of an affidavit filed on its behalf, did not receive notice until January 30, 1998, therefore the Motion to Reopen was timely filed, Habura v. Kochanowicz, CT Page 586140 Conn. App. 590 (1996).

Stengel J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Habura v. Kochanowicz
672 A.2d 512 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yellow-page-cons-v-amigo-of-conn-no-cv-97-0567141-s-may-28-1999-connsuperct-1999.