Yellow Cab Co. of Cleveland, Inc. v. Kennedy

Sixth Circuit

Yellow Cab Co. of Cleveland, Inc. v. Kennedy

95 F.2d 1023, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4350

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1938

DocketNo. 7469

StatusPublished

This text of 95 F.2d 1023 (Yellow Cab Co. of Cleveland, Inc. v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yellow Cab Co. of Cleveland, Inc. v. Kennedy, 95 F.2d 1023, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4350 (6th Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an appeal from a judgment rendered on the verdict of a jury in an action for damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in an automobile accident through the defendant’s negligence, it appearing that no motion for directed verdict was made at the conclusion of all of the evidence, and no objection made to the instructions of the court, and the sole support of the assignments of error being the alleged failure of the evidence to support the verdict, plain on the face of the record, but it also appearing that under all the circumstances of the case there was evidence of negligence, and that the evidence warranted a finding of wanton and willful misconduct, notwithstanding a conclusion of contributory negligence, and there being no other prejudicial error in the case, it is ordered that the judgment below be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In an appeal from a judgment rendered on the verdict of a jury in an action for damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in an automobile accident through the defendant’s negligence, it appearing that no motion for directed verdict was made at the conclusion of all of the evidence, and no objection made to the instructions of the court, and the sole support of the assignments of error being the alleged failure of the evidence to support the verdict, plain on the face of the record, but it also appearing that under all the circumstances of the case there was evidence of negligence, and that the evidence warranted a finding of wanton and willful misconduct, notwithstanding a conclusion of contributory negligence, and there being no other prejudicial error in the case, it is ordered that the judgment below be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 F.2d 1023, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yellow-cab-co-of-cleveland-inc-v-kennedy-ca6-1938.