Yellott v. Less
This text of 223 A.D. 868 (Yellott v. Less) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict in favor of this plaintiff was inadequate and inconsistent with the evidence, and indicates that the elements of damage were not deliberately considered and determined by the jury. (Sheehan v. Coffey, 201 App. Div. 87; Nocero v. Denitto, 212 id. 363.) Van Bark, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 A.D. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yellott-v-less-nyappdiv-1928.