Yellen v. Hara
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-15-0000341
SCPW-15-0000341 04-SEP-2015 11:47 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
MICHAEL YELLEN, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE GLENN HARA, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
THIRD CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent Judge.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CG NO. 14-1-0001)
ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
On August 31, 2015, the appellate clerk’s office received by mail a copy of Petitioner Mike Yellen’s motion for reconsideration of the August 13, 2015 order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus (“Motion”). The Motion was filed the same day, on August 31, 2015. The Motion, however, was due on August 24, 2015. See HRAP Rule 40(a); HRAP Rule 26(a). The Motion is therefore untimely. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 4, 2015.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yellen v. Hara (Yellen v. Hara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.