Yellen v. Hara

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 4, 2015·No. SCPW-15-0000341·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-15-0000341

SCPW-15-0000341 04-SEP-2015 11:47 AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

MICHAEL YELLEN, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE GLENN HARA, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

THIRD CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent Judge.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CG NO. 14-1-0001)

ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

On August 31, 2015, the appellate clerk’s office received by mail a copy of Petitioner Mike Yellen’s motion for reconsideration of the August 13, 2015 order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus (“Motion”). The Motion was filed the same day, on August 31, 2015. The Motion, however, was due on August 24, 2015. See HRAP Rule 40(a); HRAP Rule 26(a). The Motion is therefore untimely. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 4, 2015.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yellen v. Hara, (haw 2015).

Yellen v. Hara (Yellen v. Hara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.