Yell-For-Pennell, Inc. v. Joab, Inc.

243 So. 2d 438, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5412
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 1971·No. No. 70-745·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order which held that the plaintiff, Yell-For-Pennell, Inc., had not complied with the provisions of the Florida Mechanics Lien Act and that the defendant, Joab, Inc., was not liable to the plaintiff. Final judgment was rendered for Joab, Inc. and plaintiff has appealed.

The notice to the owner herein must be held sufficient. See § 713.06(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; and Boux v. East Hillsborough Apartments, Inc., Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 202.

The claim of lien was substantially in the form prescribed by the act and there was no showing that the landowner was prejudiced by the form of the claim. See § 713.08(3) and (4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; George J. Motz Construction Corp. v. Coral Pines, Inc., Fla.App. 1970, 232 So.2d 441; and Russell v. Farrey’s Wholesale Hardware Co., Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 513.

Accordingly, the final judgment for defendant is reversed and the cause is remanded for further action consistent herewith.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yell-For-Pennell, Inc. v. Joab, Inc., 243 So. 2d 438, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5412 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

243 So. 2d 438 (Yell-For-Pennell, Inc. v. Joab, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MID-STATE CONTRACTPRS, INC. v. Halo Development Corp.
342 So. 2d 1078 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Centex-Winston Corp. v. CROWN PAINT
294 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Adobe Brick and Supply Co. v. Centex-Winston Corp.
270 So. 2d 755 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Approved Dry Wall Construction, Inc. v. Morgan Properties, Inc.
263 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)