Yee Ling v. Emerick

Ohio Supreme Court

Yee Ling v. Emerick

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 1917·No. No. 15476·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

This day this cause came on to be heard upon the pleadings and evidence, and was argued by counsel and submitted to the court. On consideration whereof, the court finds that said Mary Kosmider Ling held by E. J. Emerick, superintendent at the institution referred to in the petition, is not rightfully or lawfully there held, and that she is entitled to be discharged.

[407]*407It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the said Mary Kosmider Ling be discharged from said institution.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Nichols,. C. J., Jones, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This day this cause came on to be heard upon the pleadings and evidence, and was argued by counsel and submitted to the court. On consideration whereof, the court finds that said Mary Kosmider Ling held by E. J. Emerick, superintendent at the institution referred to in the petition, is not rightfully or lawfully there held, and that she is entitled to be discharged.

[407]*407It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the said Mary Kosmider Ling be discharged from said institution.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Nichols,. C. J., Jones, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Yee Ling v. Emerick, 95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406 (Ohio 1917).

Pincite

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406 (Yee Ling v. Emerick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.