Yee Ling v. Emerick

Ohio Supreme Court

Yee Ling v. Emerick

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 23, 1917

DocketNo. 15476

StatusPublished

This text of 95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406 (Yee Ling v. Emerick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yee Ling v. Emerick, 95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406 (Ohio 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This day this cause came on to be heard upon the pleadings and evidence, and was argued by counsel and submitted to the court. On consideration whereof, the court finds that said Mary Kosmider Ling held by E. J. Emerick, superintendent at the institution referred to in the petition, is not rightfully or lawfully there held, and that she is entitled to be discharged.

[407]*407It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the said Mary Kosmider Ling be discharged from said institution.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Nichols,. C. J., Jones, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This day this cause came on to be heard upon the pleadings and evidence, and was argued by counsel and submitted to the court. On consideration whereof, the court finds that said Mary Kosmider Ling held by E. J. Emerick, superintendent at the institution referred to in the petition, is not rightfully or lawfully there held, and that she is entitled to be discharged.

[407]*407It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the said Mary Kosmider Ling be discharged from said institution.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Nichols,. C. J., Jones, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yee-ling-v-emerick-ohio-1917.