Yecheskel v. Bank of America Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Yecheskel v. Bank of America Corp.

405 F. App'x 738

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2010·No. No. 10-1111·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eli and Karen Yecheskel appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yecheskel v. Bank of Am. Corp., No. 8:09-cv-02335-RWT, 2010 WL 118366 (D.Md. Jan. 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eli and Karen Yecheskel appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yecheskel v. Bank of Am. Corp., No. 8:09-cv-02335-RWT, 2010 WL 118366 (D.Md. Jan. 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Yecheskel v. Bank of America Corp., 405 F. App'x 738 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

405 F. App'x 738 (Yecheskel v. Bank of America Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related