Yeazell v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Yeazell v. Superior Court

4 P. 503, 2 Cal. Unrep. 355

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 12, 1884

DocketNo. 9608

StatusPublished

This text of 4 P. 503 (Yeazell v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yeazell v. Superior Court, 4 P. 503, 2 Cal. Unrep. 355 (Cal. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

The application for the writ is denied. The appeal was taken from a judgment entered by consent in the justice’s court, and the superior court was authorized to [356]*356dismiss the appeal of its own motion, on an inspection of the record. Such a judgment was not appealable. If the judgment was entered in the justice’s court contrary to the stipulation, the remedy was by motion in that court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

The application for the writ is denied. The appeal was taken from a judgment entered by consent in the justice’s court, and the superior court was authorized to [356]*356dismiss the appeal of its own motion, on an inspection of the record. Such a judgment was not appealable. If the judgment was entered in the justice’s court contrary to the stipulation, the remedy was by motion in that court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 P. 503, 2 Cal. Unrep. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeazell-v-superior-court-cal-1884.