Yeager v. Winton Motor Carriage Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Yeager v. Winton Motor Carriage Co.

59 Pa. Super. 506, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 108

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 19, 1915

DocketAppeal, No. 223

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 59 Pa. Super. 506 (Yeager v. Winton Motor Carriage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yeager v. Winton Motor Carriage Co., 59 Pa. Super. 506, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 108 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The question involved in this case was substantially disposed of in Price v. Newell, 53 Pa. Superior Ct. 628, and in following it, the same trial judge fairly and adequately submitted to the jury the disputed facts in regard to the depreciation in value of the plaintiffs’ automobile resulting from the defendant’s negligence in causing the collision. The verdict as rendered might well have stood, but the trial judge in the exercise of his discretion, directed that a new trial be granted unless the plaintiffs remitted all in excess of $500, which was done, and we are not disposed to disturb it. The plaintiff was clearly entitled to damages in some amount, and after a fair trial we discover no reversible error in this record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The question involved in this case was substantially disposed of in Price v. Newell, 53 Pa. Superior Ct. 628, and in following it, the same trial judge fairly and adequately submitted to the jury the disputed facts in regard to the depreciation in value of the plaintiffs’ automobile resulting from the defendant’s negligence in causing the collision. The verdict as rendered might well have stood, but the trial judge in the exercise of his discretion, directed that a new trial be granted unless the plaintiffs remitted all in excess of $500, which was done, and we are not disposed to disturb it. The plaintiff was clearly entitled to damages in some amount, and after a fair trial we discover no reversible error in this record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Pa. Super. 506, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeager-v-winton-motor-carriage-co-pasuperct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack