Yeager v. Kelsey

49 N.W. 199, 46 Minn. 402, 1891 Minn. LEXIS 347
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJuly 1, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 49 N.W. 199 (Yeager v. Kelsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yeager v. Kelsey, 49 N.W. 199, 46 Minn. 402, 1891 Minn. LEXIS 347 (Mich. 1891).

Opinion

Dickinson, J.

It 'appears from the findings of the court, upon which alone we are called upon to review the case, that the defendant employed and authorized the plaintiffs to sell certain real estate for a specified price, and agreed to pay a stated percentage for making the sale. This action is to recover the stipulated commission. The plaintiffs negotiated with one Otis for the purchase of the property, and he paid to plaintiffs, as part of the purchase price, the sum [403]*403of $500, whereupon the plaintiffs executed an instrument signed by them only, with the designation, “Agents,” added to their signature. This writing embraced a receipt for the money paid by Otis, stating that it was part-payment for the land, which is attempted to be described; states the full price, and when the. “balance of first payment” was to be made. It is obvious, on the face of this instrument, that Otis was not thereby obligated to purchase the land. He did not sign it. Nor did he ever assume a legal obligation to purchase the property, and, after having examined the title, he refused to. accept a deed of conveyance from the defendant. Such being the case, the plaintiffs did not sell the land, and they are not entitled to the .compensation which they were to receive for selling it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLaughlin v. Heikkila
697 N.W.2d 231 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2005)
Schramsky v. Hollmichel
47 N.W.2d 177 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1951)
McPheeters v. Ronning
103 N.W. 889 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)
Johnson Bros. v. Wright
99 N.W. 103 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
Western Land Ass'n v. Banks
83 N.W. 192 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1900)
Hildenbrand v. Lillis
10 Colo. App. 522 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1898)
Gunn v. Bank of California
33 P. 1105 (California Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 N.W. 199, 46 Minn. 402, 1891 Minn. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeager-v-kelsey-minn-1891.