Yeager v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.
This text of 218 S.W. 3 (Yeager v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was for the recovery of one-half of the amount of a fee collected by- Hanson Womack as attorney for one Gardner. Gardner had a claim for damages *4 against appellee, which appellee settled for $875. Womack was entitled to and received from Gardner $87.50 for collecting same. Womack had agreed to divide his fee with appellant, for assisting him in' the matter. This he failed to do. Appellant sued appellee for one-half of said $87.50, on the theory that it should not have paid same to Wom-ack, but should have paid it to appellant.
In addition to seeking to recover one-half of $87.50, he alleged that, in settling with Womack, appellee conspired with him to heat appellant out of his fee, to appellant’s damage in the sum of $100. No unlawful or tor-tious act on the part of appellee is alleged. Such being the case, this was a suit for an amount less than $100, for which reason this court is without appellate jurisdiction. Gibson v. Hotel, 198 S. W. 413.
Eor the reason stated, the appeal herein is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 S.W. 3, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeager-v-houston-t-c-ry-co-texapp-1920.