Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Sanders

40 So. 163, 87 Miss. 607
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 40 So. 163 (Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Sanders, 40 So. 163, 87 Miss. 607 (Mich. 1905).

Opinion

Truly, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The railroad company should take heart of grace at the smallness of the verdict in this case, instead of complaining that punitive damages were awarded. If the statement of the appellee be true — and it was not only accepted by the jury, but its truth forces itself upon each individual member of the court — a more flagrant, unwarranted, and oppressive violation and trampling upon the rights of the public was never presented to an appellate court. To willfully commit a trespass upon the rights of an individual is of itself sufficient to permit the ^warding of punitive damages, though committed upon but .a single occasion. What, then, must be said of a case where for each minute of the time, by day and by night, from day to day, there was a continued violation of the rights of appellee, by the commission of an act which rendered the enjoyment, and practically the habitation, of her home impossible? Under the facts of this record, not even the limit of the amount claimed in the declaration would have induced us to interfere with the amount of the verdict. There was no error of law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laurel Equip. Co. v. MATTHEWS, ET UX.
67 So. 2d 258 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1953)
Cashin v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
28 P.2d 862 (Montana Supreme Court, 1934)
Yates v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
269 S.W. 353 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1925)
Union Cemetery Co. v. Harrison
101 So. 517 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
City of Covington v. Faulhaber
199 S.W. 32 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 So. 163, 87 Miss. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yazoo-mississippi-valley-railroad-v-sanders-miss-1905.