Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Banister
This text of 42 So. 345 (Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Banister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The Todd case, in 84 Miss., 522 (s.c., 36 South. Rep.,. 1040), and Brooks v. Black, 68 Miss., 161 (s.c., 8 South. Rep., 332; 11 L. R. A. 176; 24 Am. St. Rep., 259), and all the other cases referred to by learned counsel for the appellant, were cases in which the land was susceptible of being rented, and rent was actually paid; and all the expressions in those cases about interest being collected, where rents were paid by the evicted vendee, by the true owner, must, of course, be under[810]*810stood to have been used in reference to cases of that sort alone— that is to say, cases in which the land was rent-producing. The question in this case is this: Where a vendee is evicted by the holder of a paramount title from wild land insusceptible of producing rent, and no rent, of course, is demanded or paid, what is the true measure of damages as between the evicted vendee and his vendor? It is the principal sum paid, with legal interest thereon, as shown abundantly by the authorities cited in the carefully prepared brief of counsel for appellee.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 So. 345, 89 Miss. 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yazoo-mississippi-valley-railroad-v-banister-miss-1906.