Yazoo Lumber Co. v. Clark
This text of 48 So. 516 (Yazoo Lumber Co. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The very ingenious and able legal argument made by learned counsel for appellant on direct appeal cannot prevail on the testimony in this record, under the decisions of this court touching the invalidity of a deed to a homestead by the husband, not joined in by the wife. The deed executed to the homestead by the husband, H.' H. Breeland, was a nullity, the wife not having joined therein.- On the direct appeal the ease is affirmed.
On the cross-appeal, reluctant as we are to disturb the finding [251]*251of the unusually painstaking and accomplished chancellor who decided this cause, we are yet constrained to do so, since a repeated examination of the testimony satisfies us that Mrs. Alice B. Clark was not estopped to maintain her suit. The doctrino of equitable estoppel, as explained in our decisions, is not brought into successful play against her on testimony disclosed in the record. The decree on the cross-appeal, therefore, is reversed, and a decree will be entered here for the cross-appellant,, Mrs. Clark.
Affirmed on direct appeal; reversed on cross-appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 So. 516, 95 Miss. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yazoo-lumber-co-v-clark-miss-1909.