Yazid Malik Bey v. Quest Ira Inc
Opinion
Opinion issued March 10, 2020
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
appellant at his last known address was returned undeliverable. Appellant has neither
timely filed a brief nor requested an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (the
appellate court may dismiss for want of prosecution for failure to file appellant’s
brief).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yazid Malik Bey v. Quest Ira Inc (Yazid Malik Bey v. Quest Ira Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.