Yazid Malik Bey v. Quest Ira Inc

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 10, 2020·No. 01-19-00683-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued March 10, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

appellant at his last known address was returned undeliverable. Appellant has neither

timely filed a brief nor requested an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (the

appellate court may dismiss for want of prosecution for failure to file appellant’s

brief).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yazid Malik Bey v. Quest Ira Inc, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Yazid Malik Bey v. Quest Ira Inc (Yazid Malik Bey v. Quest Ira Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.