Yazel v. William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc.
This text of 2014 OK 58 (Yazel v. William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 1 This cause No. 111,648 Ken Yazel, Tulsa County Assessor v, The William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc., et al (Ya-zel 2) and its companion case No. 111,502 Ken Yazel, Tuiso County Assessor v. The William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc., et al (Yazel 1) involve the disposi-tive issue of whether 68 O0.S8.2011 § 2880.1(D)1 requires a county assessor to be represented by a district attorney or by the Oklahoma Tax Commission before an appegl from the Board of Equalization may proceed to the Courts, We hold that pursuant to our pronouncement in the companion case No, 111,502, Yazel 1, the county assessors may employ counsel to represent them in court proceedings including appeals from the Board of Equalization, Accordingly, we remand the matter to the Court of Civil Appeals to address the merits of the appeal.
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OPINION VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 OK 58, 364 P.3d 1290, 2014 WL 2895529, 2014 Okla. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yazel-v-william-k-warren-medical-research-center-inc-okla-2014.