Yawn v. State
192 S.E. 299, 56 Ga. App. 73, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 284
Opinions
The defendant’s motion for new trial is based solely on the
general grounds. The chief witness for the State was an accomplice. The corpus delicti was clearly proved, and other facts were shown which, independently of the testimony of the accomplice, led to an inference that the defendant was implicated in the commission of the crime charged. The jury found against the defendant on this issue, aind we must hold that the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yawn v. State, 192 S.E. 299, 56 Ga. App. 73, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 284 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).
192 S.E. 299 (Yawn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCalla v. State
66 Ga. 346 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)
Butler v. State
87 S.E. 712 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)