Yawn v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Yawn v. State

192 S.E. 299, 56 Ga. App. 73, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 284

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 30, 1937

Docket26338

StatusPublished

This text of 192 S.E. 299 (Yawn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yawn v. State, 192 S.E. 299, 56 Ga. App. 73, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 284 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinions

Guerry, J.

The defendant’s motion for new trial is based solely on the

general grounds. The chief witness for the State was an accomplice. The corpus delicti was clearly proved, and other facts were shown which, independently of the testimony of the accomplice, led to an inference that the defendant was implicated in the commission of the crime charged. The jury found against the defendant on this issue, aind we must hold that the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial. Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guerry, J.

The defendant’s motion for new trial is based solely on the

general grounds. The chief witness for the State was an accomplice. The corpus delicti was clearly proved, and other facts were shown which, independently of the testimony of the accomplice, led to an inference that the defendant was implicated in the commission of the crime charged. The jury found against the defendant on this issue, aind we must hold that the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial. Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 S.E. 299, 56 Ga. App. 73, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yawn-v-state-gactapp-1937.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack