Yaukey v. Coffman

87 A. 706, 240 Pa. 425, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 688
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 21, 1913
DocketAppeal, No. 55
StatusPublished

This text of 87 A. 706 (Yaukey v. Coffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yaukey v. Coffman, 87 A. 706, 240 Pa. 425, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 688 (Pa. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The only part of the will of the testator to be considered in determining whether the plaintiff could convey a fee simple estate is: “Item: I give and bequeath to my daughter Annie E. intermarried with John Wiil Yaukey during her natural life and at her death, to be equally divided between'her heirs of issue the property known as the Railroad property.” The evident intention of the testator was that the heirs of his daughter [427]*427should take by descent from her and not as purchasers from him. This under the rule in Shelley’s case gave her an estate tail enlarged by statute into a fee simple.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A. 706, 240 Pa. 425, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yaukey-v-coffman-pa-1913.