Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

112 F. App'x 318

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 15, 2004·No. No. 04-1727·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline Yates appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendant in this personal injury action and denying Yates’ motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. CA-03-2804-AMD (D. Md. May 11 & May 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline Yates appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendant in this personal injury action and denying Yates’ motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. CA-03-2804-AMD (D. Md. May 11 & May 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 112 F. App'x 318 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

112 F. App'x 318 (Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related