Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
This text of Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1727
JACQUELINE YATES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 2804-AMD)
Submitted: October 18, 2004 Decided: November 15, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen A. Markey, III, Amy M. Kusk, THE LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN A. MARKEY, III, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Christopher R. Dunn, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Lanham, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Yates appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment to Defendant in this personal injury
action and denying Yates’ motion to alter or amend the judgment.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. CA-03-2804-AMD (D.
Md. May 11 & May 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-v-wal-mart-stores-inc-ca4-2004.