Yates v. State
This text of 261 S.W.2d 845 (Yates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conviction is for transporting whisky in a dry area; the punishment 60 days in jail and a fine of $250.
Charlie Bullock, then sheriff of Hockley County, a dry area, observed appellant as he was driving an automobile away from a cafe located at the intersection of Highways 51 and 290, in Hockley County. He approached the car after it had moved some 30 feet, and appellant consenting, searched the automobile and took 47 pints of whisky from the “turtle” in the back. The whisky was introduced in evidence.
[167]*167Appellant did not testify nor did he offer any evidence in his behalf.
It appears from the record that appellant contended at the trial that it was incumbent upon the state to prove that the whisky was transported on a public highway, street or alley.
The prosecution was for violation of Art. 666-4 (b) V.A.P.C., and not under Sec. 27 of Art. 666 V.A.P.C. Art. 666-4 (b) which makes the transportation of whisky in a dry area an offense, without regard to whether it is transported’ upon a public highway.
The evidence sustains the conviction and no reversible error is found.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 S.W.2d 845, 159 Tex. Crim. 166, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-v-state-texcrimapp-1953.