Yates v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Yates v. State

39 S.W. 933, 37 Tex. Crim. 347, 1897 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 109

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 24, 1897

DocketNo. 1152.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 S.W. 933 (Yates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yates v. State, 39 S.W. 933, 37 Tex. Crim. 347, 1897 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 109 (Tex. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for failing to work a public road. The judgment fails to show that the jury was selected, empaneled, and sworn. This is assigned as error. We think the point well taken. Article 831, Code Crim. Proc., provides that the judgment must show the selection, empaneling, and swearing of the jury. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for failing to work a public road. The judgment fails to show that the jury was selected, empaneled, and sworn. This is assigned as error. We think the point well taken. Article 831, Code Crim. Proc., provides that the judgment must show the selection, empaneling, and swearing of the jury. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and Remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 S.W. 933, 37 Tex. Crim. 347, 1897 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-v-state-texcrimapp-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack