Yates v. State

39 S.W. 933, 37 Tex. Crim. 347, 1897 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 109
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 24, 1897·No. No. 1152.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for failing to work a public road. The judgment fails to show that the jury was selected, empaneled, and sworn. This is assigned as error. We think the point well taken. Article 831, Code Crim. Proc., provides that the judgment must show the selection, empaneling, and swearing of the jury. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yates v. State, 39 S.W. 933, 37 Tex. Crim. 347, 1897 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 109 (Tex. 1897).

39 S.W. 933 (Yates v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Quinn v. State
115 S.W. 39 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)