Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Yates v. State

Yates v. State

836 So. 2d 1096, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1256, 2003 WL 255475
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Yates v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 823 So. 2d 273 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 2003·No. No. 5D02-1313·Published

Opinion

HARRIS, C., Senior Judge,

Appellant argues, and the State concedes, that there is a conflict between the oral sentencing and the judgment of sentence. The cause is remanded to the trial court to correct the judgment.

[1097]*1097REVERSED and REMANDED for correction.

PLEUS and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yates v. State, 836 So. 2d 1096, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1256, 2003 WL 255475 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

836 So. 2d 1096 (Yates v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.