Yates v. State
836 So. 2d 1096, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1256, 2003 WL 255475
This text of 836 So. 2d 1096 (Yates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Yates v. State, 836 So. 2d 1096, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1256, 2003 WL 255475 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Appellant argues, and the State concedes, that there is a conflict between the oral sentencing and the judgment of sentence. The cause is remanded to the trial court to correct the judgment.
[1097]*1097REVERSED and REMANDED for correction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
836 So. 2d 1096, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1256, 2003 WL 255475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.