Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education

99 Ohio St. 3d 48
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 16, 2003
DocketNo. 2002-2242
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 Ohio St. 3d 48 (Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education, 99 Ohio St. 3d 48 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. I is allowed. Briefing is to proceed on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The cause is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on Proposition of Law No. II consistent with Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn., 97 Ohio St.3d 451, 2002-Ohio-6718, 780 N.E.2d 543.

Robert J. Vecchio Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Vecchio, for appellants. Lutz & Oxley Co., L.P.A., Fred M. Oxley and Erin N. Cahill, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. Cook, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education
808 N.E.2d 861 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 Ohio St. 3d 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-v-mansfield-board-of-education-ohio-2003.